[Masthead] Mostly Cloudy ~ 81°F  
High: 82°F ~ Low: 57°F
Friday, Aug. 1, 2014

Tower trouble - Call from the FAA halts water tower project

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

(Photo)
(Sentinel file photo) A second water tower like Le Mars' current tower (pictured here) can't be built as planned, according to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA told the city of Le Mars that the planned tower near 24th Street and Sixth Avenue Southwest could be a flight hazard for the airport unless it was 86 feet tall or shorter. The planned tower was 140 feet tall. This illustration is not to scale.
The planned 140-foot water tower to add to Le Mars' water system can't be built as proposed because it could be an "airway obstruction" for the local airport.

This ruling came from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the midst of the city bidding the project for construction.

"Current determination by the FAA is that any tower above 86 feet at the 24th Street South and Sixth Avenue West location would be hazardous to flights," information for Tuesday's Le Mars City Council meeting stated.

A project redesign for the planned 1-million-gallon tower is necessary, said Scott Langel, Le Mars city administrator.

He said he's hoping the project can be "put back together" by October.

McClure Engineering, of Fort Dodge, is already re-reviewing the location and design of the tower, he said.

The firm is also seeking more information from the FAA regarding its ruling.

McClure will likely come back with multiple options for the city, Langel added.

If the FAA's ruling stands, the city would have to either build a water structure 86 feet high or shorter at the planned location or consider another location.

The city already opted to purchase 2.34 acres of land for the water tower and booster station in southwest Le Mars -- about 280 feet east of the intersection of Sixth Avenue and 24th Street Southwest.

"We think that the location is in fact the best location, and as a result of that we really are reluctant to change the location," Langel said.

He explained the tower needs to be close to the water source for the water system to function efficiently.

"That's the most critical factor," he said.

To stay at this location and meet FAA requirements, the tower would likely have to take on a different shape than planned, Langel said.

Prior to this, the design for the proposed 140-foot water tower called for the supporting column to be about 90 feet tall and the bowl's height to be about 50 above that.

Now, one possibility that would keep the height below 86 feet is to construct a ground-level water tank with no support column, Langel said.

However, having a water structure at or below 86 feet is not ideal for Le Mars' water system, Langel noted.

"If you have multiple towers that are connected to the same distribution system, it's always most advantageous to have towers that are at the same total height," he said.

However, towers don't have to be at the same height -- there is an engineering method to allow for water towers at different heights, he said.

"There is a valving system that can be installed to not cause the taller tank to overflow the lower tank," Langel said.

He noted that, as McClure works on the redesign for this project, the firm will likely be working with Bolton & Menk, of Ames, which is working on the airport's master plan.

"We value the airport and we value the water system," Langel said. "We don't want one to trump the other and vice versa."

On Tuesday, the Le Mars City Council chose to reject all bids on the water tower and booster station to allow for redesign.

The council had been planning to award bids for these projects in mid-July, but delayed that action to await word from the FAA about whether the new tower would interfere with air traffic at the Le Mars Airport.

"They (the FAA) have got rules to live by, and we want it safe because we want a very viable, functional airport," Langel said.

Prior to this, the city had checked with the FAA on the project, Langel said.

The water tower project has been in planning stages for more than one year.

Money to pay for the tower and other water projects will come from increases in rates paid by all water customers.

A rate increase of 5 percent each year for three years was previously approved by the council to pay for the water system improvements.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on lemarssentinel.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

That's a 54 foot whoopsy. McClure engineering should reimburse all the costs up until this point for design plans and costs. If the city had checked with the FAA was there misinformation as to height, regulations, or location?

-- Posted by gunner2012 on Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 1:12 PM

Another in a long (and quite recent) list of Langel fiascos!

-- Posted by DissentingOpinion on Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 1:59 PM

I wonder if the Council even cares?

-- Posted by Chris2 on Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 6:05 AM

So I wonder, does this mean we will have to pay even more of a water rate increase to cover this mess up?

-- Posted by Chris2 on Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 12:17 PM

Obviously neither the council NOR the mayor care about Langel's ineptitude. If they did, he wouldn't be in his position any longer. In fact, further proof that they DON'T care can be found in the following article - http://www.lemarssentinel.com/story/1992...

The highway mess in the summer of '12, the month (minimum) delayed 4th Avenue project in the summer of '13, and now this. How does all of that failure deserve a $2600 "merit increase"? What has he done to MERIT this increase?

-- Posted by DissentingOpinion on Sun, Aug 25, 2013, at 5:26 PM

Clearly, the consultant should be held responsible. Locals might have to consider re-siting a water tower every few years [and hire a pro] but the consultant works with it daily.

-- Posted by donpaulin on Mon, Aug 26, 2013, at 10:53 AM

Does the consultant need to tell the City of Le Mars to make the purchase of the land contingent upon FAA approval?

The City knew the FAA would have to approve this project yet went ahead with the purchase without contingency.

Some times if you get credit for the good you have to take the blame for the not so good. I wonder if the City will reconsider those recent raises. Or should we refresh about some other problems...see the land across the tracks from the Public Works building that was to be the ground where Public Works expanded, uh, oh, wait after the City bought it and cleared they found a storm culvert and the property was an add shape. I repeat, AFTER the purchase. But hey, we'll get a shiny, new public works building on the South edge of town...someday. And about that pedestrian bridge across Highway 3 and that wetland.....

While not million dollar examples they do point out instances of sloppy work that should not have happened that will cost the City.

-- Posted by tiredofrhetoric on Thu, Aug 29, 2013, at 2:07 PM

They can't revoke the raise.. If they did how would the Langel family pay for the new farm land in city limits they just received??? Opps, not public knowledge yet! Sorry!

-- Posted by lemartion on Fri, Aug 30, 2013, at 1:33 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.