[Masthead] Overcast ~ 55°F  
High: 72°F ~ Low: 58°F
Saturday, May 23, 2015

County may still push annex building forward

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

The Plymouth County Supervisors aren't willing to take "no" for an answer on plans to add a building near the courthouse.

Last week, the Le Mars Board of Zoning Adjustment denied the county's request for a variance and permit to construct an annex building on the southeast corner of the courthouse block.

The building is planned to help alleviate a space crunch in the courthouse.

Supervisor Don Kass pointed out Tuesday that the city's code of ordinances states that any "public improvement" does not fall under city zoning regulation.

The annex building, he said, would fall under the definition of "public improvement," which the code defines as "a building or construction work which is constructed under the control of a governmental entity and is paid for in whole or part with funds of the governmental entity."

"The county attorney's office . . . re-affirmed my opinion that we don't need a variance or a conditional use permit from the city," Kass said. "The city excludes our concern in this case."

After discussion, the board decided the next step would be to have Kass and Supervisor Craig Anderson will speak with Jason Vacura, Le Mars city code enforcement officer, about the situation.

"The bottom thing is we all need to get along," Anderson said.

He responded to concerns that the plans to build the annex had "just popped up."

"We've discussed this project in the last two years 19 times . . . and those were all public meetings," Anderson said. "These aren't decisions we came by lightly. . . . We're trying to do, quite frankly, what we can afford. I'm don't have any interested in putting the county in debt to add office space to the courthouse."

One concern, Kass said, was the county was constructing a new building rather than using one of several existing, empty buildings in Le Mars.

It would cost $5,000 a year if a $20 per hour state employee had to spend an hour a day going between two buildings, Kass pointed out.

"We need the proximity to the courthouse," Anderson agreed.

Kass said some people were concerned the planned building, possibly a modular building, would be an eyesore near the historic courthouse.

"We need to change the way we talk about what we're doing," Kass said. "When we use the word 'modular,' people get the idea we're bringing in a double-wide trailer, and that is not the case."

The public, he said, hasn't had a chance to see the products the supervisors have seen.

"I don't think people object so much to us having a building but they want one that looks nice next to the courthouse," he said. "I 100 percent agree."

Kass also suggested removing the current storage shed near the courthouse as part of the project and including storage space in the new building.

"I'm willing to spend a little more money getting rid of this shed out here," Kass said. "It should be our goal to make the courthouse grounds look better when we're done than it does now."


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on lemarssentinel.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

It's amazing, out of the few ordinances the city chooses to enforce they couldn't get this one right. Where was the city attorney during all this?? Really makes city hall look bad to everyone.

-- Posted by one4theroad on Wed, Oct 14, 2009, at 6:36 PM

:-)

-- Posted by Michael Lamb on Wed, Oct 14, 2009, at 7:35 PM

Maybe they should do like I had to when I subdivided my property with a size variance. I paid a $350 bribe, sorry I meant fee, and it was OK

-- Posted by cranemaster on Thu, Oct 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM

OK Board of Supervisors, the state is going to lay off people (10% the way it looks) A number of those folks work IN the Plymouth County courthouse.

If we have less employees, we should have more space.

If the offices contract a little bit on their space (read SHARE) and the BOARD gives up their DUST COVERED TAJ MAHAL that is only used a FEW hours a MONTH, then there should be plenty of space to go around!

That way we don't have to go into ANY debt!

What a novel idea! Not spending money we don't have, maybe this could catch on with Des Moines and Washington!

-- Posted by 15yearresident on Tue, Oct 20, 2009, at 3:03 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: