![]() (Sentinel photo by Amy Erickson) [Click to enlarge] |
Nathan Vanderplaats, aide to Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), presented Harkin's views on a health reform bill currently being discussed in the Senate.
Vanderplaats answered questions from about a dozen Plymouth County health professionals and residents gathered Wednesday at Floyd Valley Hospital.
Vanderplaats began by sharing statistics relating to the current state of health care.
"In the United States we now spend a staggering $2.3 trillion a year on health care," Vanderplaats said. "Without reform, over the next 10 years Americans will spend $33 trillion on health care."
Despite those numbers the U.S. is ranked just 37th among 191 nations by the world health care organization, Vanderplaats said.
"We spend twice as much per capita on health care as European countries, but we're twice as sick with chronic disease," he said. "In spite of all this spending, nearly 50 million Americans are uninsured."
But, Vanderplaats said, Harkin intends to combat those "staggering" numbers by fighting to obtain four key principles in the health care reform bill.
Following is a summation of those objectives.
1. Building on what already works.
"Any individual who is satisfied with their existing coverage will be able to keep it," Vanderplaats said.
2. Make health insurance work for everyone, not just healthy and wealthy people.
"We must extend coverage to all," Vanderplaats said. "We must make sure insurance plans cover basic needs."
3. Improve the quality of care.
"We must strengthen the workforce and tie reimbursement to quality," Vanderplaats said. "Currently our payment systems encourage the delivery of more care rather than better care."
4. Renew emphasis on wellness and disease prevention.
"We have a huge opportunity," Vanderplaats said. "We can not only save hundreds of billions of dollars we can also dramatically improve the health of the American people."
After sharing Harkin's principles, Vanderplaats opened up the floor to answer questions.
A doctor from Medical Associates asked if the wellness and prevention part of the bill was intended to be a savings.
"Yes. The care they will need is less because they will be healthier," Vanderplaats said.
For example, if someone quit smoking today there wouldn't be an immediate savings but 40 years later there may be because that individual would likely require much less health care during those years, Vanderplaats said.
Julie Sitzmann, Medical Associates administrator, asked if there would be incentives to encourage participation in wellness and prevention programs.
"We can't force people to take better care of themselves," Vanderplaats said. "But there are ways to encourage people to participate."
He also assured Patrick Schmitz, Plains Area Mental Health Center executive director, there would be equal coverage for mental health and substance abuse in the new legislation.
But he couldn't answer what will happen if premiums aren't enough to keep a reformed health system self-sufficient.
"What if it isn't self sustaining?" Schmitz asked. "Will we throw in more tax dollars?"
On another avenue, several at the meeting said the government should take more time with a health reform bill to make sure all the kinks are out before approving it.
President Barack Obama said he wants a bill on his desk ready for his signature by October.
"I'm afraid it's moving too fast," Schmitz said. "Maybe we're standing on two or three legs when we maybe need four or five."
Mike Donlin, Floyd Valley Hospital administrator, said previous government attempts at reforming health care have failed and he hoped this one wouldn't follow the same path.
"I really hope the moment is not lost," Donlin said. "If the financing part is not lined up, this is not going to work. It can't."
A Le Mars doctor in the audience said it seems like the open option in health care reform protects individuals from hard decisions, but it doesn't protect the system.
"It's more of a bottom-up thing than a top-down thing," he said.
Vanderplaats said if someone needs care they get it and the system will survive if people's mindset can be changed concerning doctor visits.
"We focus on illness right now. We reward sick care," Vanderplaats said. "We don't reward health care. We don't focus on preventative."
![[Masthead]](http://www.lemarssentinel.com/images/nameplate.png)


Health care in America does not currently work for all Americans but the cure proposed by the Obama administration will make things far worse.
If a bureaucrat decides when and where you receive healthcare that will be an even bigger personal crisis.
The American Medical Association opposes the Obama plan saying, "The introduction of a new public plan threatens to restrict patient choice by driving out private insurers, which currently provide coverage for nearly 70 percent of Americans," and would lead to an "explosion of costs" (Pear, 6/10).
In countries with government run health care such as Canada and Great Britain bureaucrats make decisions for their people. Care is prioritized and rationed. Decisions are based on age and cost. Doctors may be assigned.
Waits in those countries are often months long and often the condition worsens or the patient may even die before their turn comes.
If under Obama care you wait weeks or months to see a doctor or to have a procedure done that will be an even bigger personal crisis.
Canadians come to the US now for health care to avoid long waits. If the Obama plan is passed where will you go?
How will the Obama administration pay for your new "free" health care?
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated $1 to $1.5 Trillion in costs depending on various legislative proposals. Costs are expected to rise each year beyond the original 10 year CBO projection.
For more on the cost of the proposal please go to the Heritage Foundation publication, "The Senate Health Care Bills: $1.5 Trillion Sticker Shock"
"About one in eight U.S. workers who receive health benefits from an employer -- more than nine million workers -- could pay higher income taxes on benefits as part of a Senate proposal that aims to raise billions of dollars to finance health-care reform, according an independent analysis of the proposal." - Fox Business News
Don't let government bureaucrats make your health care decisions
4-5 months ago the government hiked the cost of tobacco so smokers can pay for health care for children. I smoke and I don't mind paying more as long as the child gets the health care.
Hike up my taxes so the Adult unemployed, Adult homeless,and the Adult others without health care can receive free health care. That is PURE BULL.
I am sick and tired of taking care of everybody else's problems, especially when I have to struggle to take care of my own. I and my family has had hard times, and we had to go without. When that happened, we picked our-selfs up, brushed off the dust and started over again. What ever happened to the Proud American that took care of there own business. If the government keeps having that Proud American pay for this and that via increased taxes, what happens when we have nothing left for our-selfs.
Once again, I have no problem helping out the children in this country. The unemployed, get a job, there is jobs out there, you may have to swallow your pride, but there is jobs. Same goes for employed people that lack health care, get 2 jobs. I have been working 2 jobs since I graduated from LCHS.
Before you know it, President Obama will be asking the tax payers to pay off Micheal Jacksons +400 Million Dollar dept. When is enough, enough?? What ever happened to the word SELFPRIDE
If all of what Crosbo has said is true why does the United States rank down so far on the list of the best medical care, I think its 17th in the world. When you call in sick to our local clinic do you ever get to see a Doctor or do you get to see a Physicans Assistant, yet get billed as you saw a Doctor? I guess you'd have to wait 2 weeks to see the Doc so I don't see your point.