Le Mars, Iowa · Friday, March 19, 2010
[Masthead] Partly Cloudy ~ 32°F  
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (4) Share link

Cell phone photos could make teens sex offenders

Tuesday, April 28, 2009
(Photo)
A Florida teen faces charges of child pornography. A district attorney in Pennsylvania threatened a group of high schoolers with the same charges.

All because of photos on their cell phones.

Teens who take or send nude or revealing pictures via cell phones could be in deep water. This practice, dubbed "sexting," isn't just hitting the coasts.

One in 5 teens have sent or posted online nude or semi-nude pictures or video of themselves, according to a national survey by The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.

And that includes teens in Le Mars.

The Le Mars Police are in the middle of an investigation of a case of younger teenagers, 13 to 14 years old, taking allegedly inappropriate photos of each other on their cell phones.

Sexting has been reported in a few instances among Le Mars Community School (LCS) students, according to Assistant High School Principal Mark Iverson.

"In one case, a student let a boyfriend take pictures of her, and a friend got a hold of his phone and sent the pictures in a forward to others," Iverson said. "That happens often -- people forward things."

When the law gets involved, it may not matter if a teen took the photos, forwarded them, or innocently received them.

In all of those cases, a teen could face felony charges.

"Child pornography, distribution of child pornography and possession of child pornography, plus they might have to register as a sex offender," Iverson said. "Even if you receive it and keep it on your phone, there could still be consequences. My advice: get rid of it."

Le Mars Police Chief Stuart Dekkenga said each case of sexting might be different.

According to Iowa law, if a person possesses an electronic file, like a picture or video on a cell phone, of a nude minor and if the picture is used for "arousing or satisfying the sexual desires of a person who may view the depiction," the person with the photos could face felony charges.

"The law applies across the whole spectrum -- not just adults," Dekkenga said.

Many teens don't realize how severe consequences could be for sending on a nude or obscene photo by cell phone, Iverson said.

"With cell phones and things, face to face conversation has decreased," he said, adding that, with that decrease, some social boundaries have been dropped. That, he said, might explain why teens might think it's OK to send revealing photos of themselves to others.

"People believe whoever they're sending it to is trustworthy," Dekkenga said.

But a message sent cannot be retrieved, he said.

According to the national survey by The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, 38 percent of teens said they had received sexually suggestive texts originally meant for someone else.

"Once you send it you lose all control," Iverson said. "Someone could post it on the internet. Who knows? What you put out there is open for people to see."

Iverson warned it might not stop there.

"You could be applying for a job, and when they do a search for you, all these pictures pop up," he said. "That doesn't look good for a job interview."

At LCS, the administration has discussed adding a section to the health program at the school to discuss sexting and the legal consequences.

"Cell phones are a whole new area of school enforcement," Iverson said.

But most sexting happens outside of school, he added.

"Parents," Iverson said, "talk to your kids about the legal consequences."


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on lemarssentinel.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Zero tolerance has GOT to be replaced by common sense somewhere people. How are our children supposed to learn common sense and modesty in an age of excess in everything. The gloom and doom attitude of Mr. Iverson is at best laughable. We can tell why he's an assistant. You need common sense to run the school and well - he doesn't seem to have to have it. There is life outside of the high school and fear tactics of things appearing on your permanent "cyber" record are ridiculous.

-- Posted by dieseldiva on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, at 10:19 AM

Look, these teens are not the criminals. The problem is, at some point a pedophile WILL get ahold of these photos...

Kids do stupid things. And, by definition of child pornography, these pics fit the bill. Just like you can't be in possesion of booze or drugs, you cant be in posession of underage, nude photos of your BFFs.

Its a law, and it applies to everyone including teenagers.

-- Posted by MommyinIOWA on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, at 11:21 AM

Question for you Mommy. Are you saying then that since these pictures constitute "child pornography", if you take nude photos of yourself for your significant other, do those pictures constitute pornography?

-- Posted by Whiners on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, at 4:56 PM

Yes. I think so... But as an adult, pornography is very legal. I believe you can purchase certain videos and magazines at the age of 18.

I think the problem arises because these children cannot fully understand the consequences of their actions. ( I am in no way saying that 18 year olds are mature enough either, but the law says they are adults) They dont realize the affect that this can have on them long-term. People that don't even know them can post these pictures on Facebook or Myspace and there is no recourse for the self made victim to get them removed. (unless they flag it for having child porn) Even that takes days or sometimes weeks. Its humiliating and shaming for the person that has been exploited. Granted, they never should have taken the picture in the first place.

My main concern, is that pedofiles can copy or tag these picture and use them to advance their own sick agendas. I would not want my child in this situation at all, but I darn sure would not want her image to be passed around from sick-o to sick-o.

-- Posted by MommyinIOWA on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, at 9:57 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.