The board approved a total of $208,500 in budget cuts and made the decision to implement the Cash Reserve Levy (CRL) to bring in $500,000 for the fiscal year 2010 budget.
That brings the current property tax levy of $12.71 per thousand valuation to $13.36 per thousand valuation, a 65 cent per thousand increase from the FY09 total tax rate.
Both the cuts and the CRL were unanimously approved by the board, following a lengthy discussion before a large crowd of teachers, parents, students and community members.
The cuts
The cuts become effective for the 2009-2010 school year.
Cut were two middle school teachers for $115,000.
One elementary teacher was cut, reducing a third grade section at Clark at $53,000.
The recommendation to not purchase textbooks totaling $65,000 was cut in half, totaling $32,500.
Three of five recommended assistant coaching positions were cut, saving $8,000. The board voted to cut assistant middle school wrestling, ninth grade football assistant, and assistant high school track coach-combined throwing coach. The board kept the assistant seventh grade football coach and assistant varsity football coach, citing the number of participants in the programs.
No reductions were made in the extended contracts of high school/middle school counselors, music, and vocational agriculture. The recommendation was to reduce those contracts (days extended beyond the 180-day school year contract) by 50 percent for a savings of $20,000.
Public comment
Two people addressed the board during a time for public comment regarding the possible expenditure reductions.
Heidi Boehme, a parent with children attending Clark Elementary, questioned why that school was again taking a cut. She expressed concern for the classes where students are being moved out, citing a loss of student leadership and role models as well as a change in the academic challenges for students.
"We have a special demographic of students in our school," Boehme said. "These kids need stability. The teachers and staff love the kids like their own. It's frustrating when no one stands up for the school."
"You've got to give us common sense reasons why these decisions are being made. So far we haven't gotten any," Boehme concluded.
Parent Mark Leonard spoke in support of keeping the extended contracts, citing a need for all the services provided beyond the school year.
"I'd hate to see losing the summer music lessons," he said. "I'd like to see more counseling and vocational agriculture. These make stronger citizens and should be the last things cut," he added.
Budget cut discussion
Board members considered the potential budget cuts line-by-line after only one board member, Patrick Murphy, favored a total package cut.
The reduction of the two middle school teachers will change the teaming concept of teaching from three- and four-person teams to three-person teams. Those instructors are responsible for reading, language arts, math, science and social studies. It also means the loss of an eighth grade elective community cultures class.
According to middle school principal Steve Webner, the loss of two teachers will reduce seven sections of students to six sections, putting more students in each class.
The elementary reduction follows a cut of a fourth and fifth grade section for the 2008-09 school year. Students affected now attend Franklin or Kluckhohn Elementary. The cut of a third grade teacher and section will follow the same guidelines.
Board members discussed the condition of textbooks which need to be replaced. Last year the board indicated not purchasing textbooks would be for one year only.
"At the bare minimum, we need to provide good books," said board member Dan Smith.
Board members received written reports from high school and middle school counselors, vocational agriculture and music instructors outlining the work done during the extended contract days.
Board member Mark Hemmingson expressed his concern about cutting the assistant varsity football coach position, citing the amount of time needed for coaches to have individual contact with players.
"On the other side, I'm also concerned about music," Hemmingson said. "Music is the hallmark of our school and I don't want to lose that." He pointed to the delay of Phase II construction, which would include new music facilities.
"I think that program is taking a bigger hit," Hemmingson said, referring to the cut last year of a half-time instructor in music.
Board member Brenda Phelan echoed a concern for the assistant football coaches, adding the assistant seventh grade football position should also be kept. She also spoke in favor of keeping the textbook purchase in the budget.
FY 10 and beyond
In presenting the preliminary 2009-10 budget information, Wendt told board members he must bring a budget to the board by March 23, and needed decisions made either Monday night or at a special meeting March 16 in order to follow guidelines to hold a pubic hearing and certify the budget by the April 15 deadline.
Property valuations for FY 2009-10 will be $502,729,617, up from $471,051,708 for the 2008-09 fiscal year.
He also said while allowable growth for 2009-10 is set at 4 percent, Gov. Chet Culver has put only 2 percent funding in the state's budget.
There are indications, Wendt added, that the remaining 2 percent of allowable growth may be funded by federal stimulus dollars. He reminded the board that federal stimulus dollars are available for only two years, at which time the state will again be total responsible for school funding dollars.
Wendt said the district is projected to have an enrollment decrease in the next two years, based on larger graduation classes versus a smaller incoming kindergarten and on smaller enrollments in the lower grades.
Raising the levy rate for the school district would not be a popular decision as both the city and county have approved budgets with no tax levy increase, Wendt continued.
Assuming a 4 percent allowable growth figure, Wendt recommended the board utilize the Cash Reserve Levy in the amount of $500,000, with that $500,000 being put into reserve for future budget years and unexpected events with the FY10 budget.
"This year it is possible to levy (the Cash Reserve Levy) and put it away," Wendt said.
By putting the $500,000 in a reserve rather than spending it on general operating fund expenditures, the district's spending authority will not be adversely affected.
Murphy said he was concerned about long-term use of the Cash Reserve Levy with the allowable growth rate going down for FY10, and indicated he would bring up pursuing the Instructional Support Levy (ISL) again.
Wendt said with enrollment and allowable growth projections, the ISL becomes more and more important to the district.
The FY10 levy of $13.36 per thousand puts Le Mars Community Schools as the third lowest in total tax rate among Lakes Conference Schools and third lowest among Plymouth County schools. The new levy is also well below the FY09 state average of $14.70 per thousand.
![[Masthead]](http://www.lemarssentinel.com/images/nameplate.png)

Cutting programs, positions and other items are commonplace in todays world. Nothing wrong with that. Maybe the Le Mars Comm. school system should consider a little different approach to saving the district money without cutting out anything.
This would be a good time to adopt a "Pay to Play" system for all athletics in the district. This is not a new science. It is used and proven in schools in other states. Illinois and Ohio to name a couple.
It really would not be anything new around here either. We pay a registration fee to have our kids in sports before they are in school and pay to have them on traveling teams before they are in middle school. We also pay for all of the travel and entry fees for them to go to all of the games in Minneapolis, Sioux Falls, Omaha, Kansas City, etc. when they are on those teams. Why not just continue it into the middle school and high school setting?
At Le Mars Community Schools there may be a couple of sports that create more revenue than what they appear to cost. Looking at the school line item budget would probably not come out with that senerio though if you were to add up all costs that go into them. Then put all sports into one fish bowl and look out, the numbers would scare you.
Don't get me wrong, I love sports. I grew up playing baseball, football, basketball, running track, ping pong, bowling. But education is primary. An uneducated society is a dead society. Remember, less than 1 percent of college athletes go on to play professional sports. What percentage does that leave when you go down to the high school level.
You may say I am a talking head. Well, it seems as time goes on things keep getting eliminated from our school system. Will the preference be to keep sports and eliminate, new books, staff, building maintenance, lab materials, QUALITY EDUCATION?
Thank you for your time,
Joethetaxpayer
Although I do agree charging an activity fee is a good idea; in Iowa, you cannot charge a fee for participation in extra-curricular activities like private schools can. So this is not a district decision.
Just wondering if there was any talk about retirements at the meeting? I was told there are 9 teachers interested in retiring early, if the district has "incentives" you could say. This should be looked at closely. Not only would it give some of those getting cut a job back but the district would be able to hire first year teachers at a cheaper cost. It would also bring fresh new ideas to the district. If those teachers are wanting out bring in someone new who is excited to share their new ideas to the district. Glad to read the Cash Levy is being put in place. Those who petitioned will be crying about their choice now!
Thank you for the info dodgers84. Seems like the same old factor, politics controls and regulates everything. Not common sense or practicality.
How do they determine what position teachers were cut? Seniority? Just curious who go the pink slips.
Maybe Mr. Wendt should take a cut in pay to help in this process. I am sure he could live on half of his pay thus allowing a teacher or two to continue to work and survive in these economic hard times.
I would like to commend the LCS school board for their hard work and dedication to the students of this district. The combination of such tough economic times and lack of support from some members of our community has resulted in difficult decisions that have had to be made. It is obvious that these decisions were well thought out and not taken lightly. Thank you board members for your service and constant professionalism.
Dr. Wendt is not going to take a pay cut...Would you?? Be honest....It is absolutely moronic to post suggestions of that nature. I sure wouldn't take a pay cut, especially with all the crap I would have to put up with...
Including people like you saying he should take a pay cut. Its not his fault people are moving away. I am in fact thinking of moving and I will be taking my 2 school age kids with me...
Touche`
I'm pretty sure position cuts are based on seniority. That's how it is in the SC district. Just guessing it's the same here.
Too bad the budget doesn't include some of the suggestions presented...
This little note to ckgt127
Just because one signed the petition DOES NOT mean that the person is voting NO. It means that they feel that it should go to vote. Also Dr. Wendt decided not to have it go to vote if I understand. I have talked to people that signed the petition and were going to vote yes but felt that it is the right of being in the good old USA that they have that right. And no I didn't sign the petition
fanof all
"We the undersigned are opposed to the Lemars Community School Board initiating the ISL Tax levy."
That is the first sentence on all 107 pages of the petition.
Those people that were unsure of what they were signing should have read the top of the page first.
As I said. I talked to people that signed the petition but were going to vote yes. That is the only way they felt that is was fair to the people of the LCS tax base to have a voice in the matter.
Again it wasn't a vote it was a petition.
It should have said we are opposed to LCS initiating the tax levy WITHOUT community approval. That is probably how some people took it to mean.
Face it, you signed something without even reading it. Like was said earlier, you can't fix stupid. Live with it.
Amazedagam:
I really don't think that you needed to use this kind of language. Did you explain to the person that this vote was for against the tax levy? I just don't think you needed to be writting stupid it kinda shows how ??????
amazedagain
You must not of read my whole comment. If you did you would of see that I DID NOT sign anything. I also agree with longtimeresident about name calling, what someone feels about something isn't stupid it is their opinion and the last I know people have a right to think what they want. If you don't agree with it that is also your right, but, that doesn't make YOU stupid because you think differently than someone else.
amazedagain
maybe i should type slower. Some people signed the petition because they were opposed to LCS starting the ISL (as it states). They wanted the people of Le Mars to decide this.