![]() After nearly three weeks in the city pound, this Jack Russell Terrier is ready to find a home. Under a proposed city ordinance, it might be easier to find the owners of strays like this pup, held by Tammy Singer, Le Mars Veterinary Clinic office manager and veterinary assistant. The clinic serves as the city pound and takes in about 100 stray pets each year from Le Mars alone. [Click to enlarge] |
This dog, the veterinarian assistant said, was brought to the clinic -- which also serves as the city pound -- several weeks ago. It was found loose near Greenwood Avenue in Le Mars. Although it has a collar, the pup has no tags to tell who its owners might be.
If a Le Mars ordinance requiring dog and cat licenses is approved, and if owners follow the new rule, less pets will be stranded like this terrier.
![]() |
Currently the local police department is handling stray pets in Le Mars.
"It's not their job," veterinarian Dr. Paul Prieksat said.
Under the proposed city ordinance, dog and cat owners in Le Mars will be required to bring their pet to a local veterinarian's office, pay a fee and get the metal tag, which will include a number that will link that dog or cat to the owner's information.
"The tag fits on their collar," Prieksat said. "If the animal is lost, the animal control officer will use the number on the tag to take the animal back to its home."
Along with paying the fee -- $6 for neutered or spayed pets and $12 for other animals -- owners will also have to make sure their pet has an up-to-date rabies shot.
This rule will require tags for all dogs and cats 6 months and older.
Prieksat said this ordinance will be helpful in identifying stray and lost pets that come into the pound from Le Mars.
"We get over 100 dogs a year from the city," said Prieksat.
About 50-60 percent of them are reclaimed, he said.
"It's frustrating to have them here and know they're a dog from in town, but we have no way of finding out who they belong to," Prieksat said.
Prieksat estimated that one-fourth of the animals brought to the pound are unclaimed and eventually must be euthanized.
Nikki Sharp, another Le Mars Veterinary Clinic employee, said the ordinance might help reunite more animals with owners.
"People don't understand what we go through," she said. "If you have to put a baby puppy to sleep, it's sad."
Prieksat himself has adopted a few unclaimed dogs.
"We wish we could adopt out every one of them," he said. "Realistically, it's not going to happen."
Up until the mid 1980s, Le Mars and Plymouth County used to have a dog licensing rule.
Dog owners were required, once a year, to come to the Plymouth County Courthouse to pick up a dog tag. To receive it, they had to pay $1 and show proof of a current rabies shot.
"That's what it was really about -- getting the rural people as well as the city people to give their pets rabies shots," said County Auditor Kae Meyer.
Each tag had the year on it and a number.
"If someone found the dog and called us, we could tell them who the dog belonged to," Meyer said.
The ordinance was abandoned, Meyer added, for several reasons.
By that time, people had caught on to the importance of giving pets rabies shots. Also, the ordinance required extensive bookkeeping and was not paying for itself.
"It got to be quite expensive," Meyer said.
Under the proposed new ordinance, $1 from each licensing fee will be given to the licensing veterinarian.
This won't be a money-making operation for the vet clinics, Prieksat noted. In fact, he doubted they would break even.
The remaining pet license fee and any fines for licensing violations or costs for abandoned or unclaimed animals will be used for animal control costs.
If a stray is picked up and doesn't have a license, the current $25 fine for abandoned or running dogs will be applied, along with the current boarding costs of $10 per day for a large dog, $8 per day for a small dog, and $6 per day for cats.
If cat owners choose not to put a collar on their animal, they will be required to have proof their cat is licensed with the city.
Le Mars' new pet license rule won't become official until it is read three times at city council meetings and approved by the council. The first two readings of the ordinance have passed -- the most recent one at the Nov. 18 council meeting in a 3-1 vote. Councilman Rex Knapp voted against it and Councilman John Leonard was absent.
The third reading is set for the Dec. 2 city council meeting.
If approved, the licensing ordinance will become effective Jan. 1, 2009.
After that, it will be up to pet owners to bring their pets into the veterinarian to pick up the tags.
Both the Town & Country Veterinary Clinic and the Le Mars Veterinary Clinic will offer the tags.
The intention of the council, according to Assistant City Administrator Bill Cole, is to have pet owners sign up for the licenses when they come in for their pets' annual rabies shots and checkups.
"We can't force anyone to do it," Prieksat said. "But it will be a good tool to help with all the lost animals."
Beyond the tag
Along with metal tags, some pet owners have opted for an additional way to identify their pet: a microchip.
Here's how it works: a veterinarian injects a microchip under the pet's skin between the shoulder blades. The microchip is about the size of a grain of rice.
Veterinarians check for the presence of a microchip by running a microchip scanner over the pet's shoulder blades. The scanner will read the chip's unique code, allowing the pet's owner to be identified.
![[Masthead]](http://www.lemarssentinel.com/images/nameplate.png)



Those parties that don't claim their pets back when lost, about 50% according to the article, don't want them back. If they did, a phone call or 2 would lead them back to the vet clinic. So I highly doubt that these caring folks would spend 6 or 12 dollars to have a tag. And why should I as a pet owner pay for the 100 or so that end up as a stray?
It will not be 100 dollars you only have to pay if you loose the animal. If you keep track of your animal and follow the law it will not be a problem. And first of all if people are going to just let their animals go and not care what happens to them because they are no longer wanted then why have a pet in the first place. They are called pets because they are part of your family. Having to see all these stray animals in the newspapers for weeks trying to be adopted is sad. If you see your own animal in the paper and do not claim it you are heartless. Most people already have paid these fees on their visits to the vet. So they won't owe any money. Animals die daily by cars and because people do not claim them and they sit in a kenal for months and they then are put down. is it really worth it? think about it what did the innocent animal do to you? What if this happened to youor dog?
It will not be 100 dollars you only have to pay if you loose the animal. If you keep track of your animal and follow the law it will not be a problem. And first of all if people are going to just let their animals go and not care what happens to them because they are no longer wanted then why have a pet in the first place. They are called pets because they are part of your family. Having to see all these stray animals in the newspapers for weeks trying to be adopted is sad. If you see your own animal in the paper and do not claim it you are heartless. Most people already have paid these fees on their visits to the vet. So they won't owe any money. Animals die daily by cars and because people do not claim them and they sit in a kenal for months and they then are put down. is it really worth it? think about it what did the innocent animal do to you? What if this happened to youor dog?
I am still confused. Our dogs wear their tags provided because they have current rabies tags. This is the tag that identifies them. Why have them wear a second tag? I would think one form of ID is enough. This is an unnecessary penalty to those who do keep up with their vaccinations - and for those people who do not get their pets vaccinated - well, this is not going to make them bring them in. If they want pets, ID'd but not vacinnated, they can buy those little metal tags that are sold in stores and add their phone numbers. I guess I am missing something here. Oh well, yes, what I am picking up is extra revenue at the expense of good citizens.
justanoutsider:
Don't worry about being confused. The city council seems to be that way more than just often.
1: Mandatory dog registration
2. Mandatory recycling 01/01/2010
3. What mandatory next?
It's no wonder why we don't grow and why people leave the Le Mars area.
economics101... AMEN :)
The title of this article just caught my attention - "Dog Tags Might Get Stray Dogs Home..." MIGHT??? And I am also wondering if there is a brother-in-law of someone who is looking for an easy job...
Some of our councilpersons have been there too long. They've lost site of any good ideas and are really out of touch with any of this towns real needs. Something called "leadership" would be nice if we had anyone on the council or staff that knew what the word meant.
It seems a lot of people are missing the point. The intention of the dog licensing is to hire an animal control person again. Up until a few years ago LeMars always had an animal control person, but when the last one left the city did not replace them. Animal control does more than just pick up strays, any time there is a problem with an animal, be it a dog, cat, squirrel, turkey, really any animal, the control officer will be the person to call.
The person that stated why should they be responsible for the 100 strays, is being pretty cold, how could they possibly know that they will never be one of the people that lose their pet. As for people that do not want their pets back, the ordinance will help a lot, because abandoning a pet is animal neglect and a crime.
Face it pet ownership is a responsibility. You have to get your kids shots and show proof of that, a responsible pet owner should do the same for their pets.
They better open that job position to the public. A certain brother-in-law better not be a shoe in.