That Instructional Support Levy (ISL) has proved the source of much debate. Two LCS School Board members -- Patrick Murphy and Mark Stelzer -- sat down with the Daily Sentinel editorial staff to talk through some of the questions about the levy.
(Advertisement)
|
The board members pointed back to 2002.
"When we first added all-day, every day kindergarten, we did not have enough money to do that. We used operating fund money because we believed it was important," Stelzer said. "We've added extra sections and had lower class sizes."
The board did not raise taxes at that time, he said, but chose to spend down the operating fund balance.
Then enrollment declined by roughly 30 two years ago and 80 last year, which caused LCS to get less state funding, leaving the district in need of cutting back.
Didn't the state increase how much funding schools get?
Yes, the amount of money the state gives each school per student increased by nearly 4 percent. However, because that money is given on a per-student basis, with declining enrollment, LCS's portion of that was trimmed back.
"The increase in state aid for the 08-09 school year should have been 3.9 percent. We got .92 percent," Murphy explained. Our state aid is almost exactly the same as last year."
"The state provides a huge amount of support, but they don't do everything. State aid is not enough for everything we do," Stelzer said. "It never has been."
"The ISL allows individual districts to get what they need rather than a blanket amount that the state gives everyone," Stelzer continued. "They want us to levy just what we need."
Why did enrollment drop so quickly?
"We (Le Mars) are a transient community, people leave and people come. There is no one reason for the drop. Families come and go in the district," Murphy said. "I harped at board meetings for years that we have to watch that student count."
"And we did and it was stable," Stelzer added.
"It wasn't unrealistic to see an 80-kid drop. It scared us," Murphy said. "But that's why we had the administration really pursue that and go through who left and what happened and give us a report. There was no one reason for that 80-person drop. Some families with three to four kids, some with one or two, in all grade levels, were coming and going," Murphy said.
"That also means that the state of Iowa is in trouble with population," Murphy continued. Most every school district in Iowa, with the exception of a few large ones, are going to experience declining enrollment in the next decade, he said, "and the Iowa Legislature needs to find a way to address it."
Why are you bringing the ISL back for vote again so soon?
The longer the district waits to pass the ISL, the more cuts the district will see in the meantime as the board works to make the budget work, the board members explained.
"We've already got a 2-3 year delay (for the money to come in) by losing it in March," Stelzer said. "If it had passed in March, it would have been reflected in the property tax statements already from this summer. We would have had some money for support already by the end of this year. It would have started us climbing out of the hole by next spring. Now it's going to be at least the spring of 2010."
"We had to cut down a huge amount this last academic year. We'll have to do it again this year, no matter what, and the best we can hope for is to start recovering soon. The promise of funding can help us say, OK, we can get through this year and it's going to start coming back," Stelzer said
"I'm going to bring it back every time as quickly as we can until we know it's not going to work or it's going to work. It takes so long to get the thing to work," Murphy added.
If we can afford building projects, why not teachers and books?
Building projects are paid for out of a fund that is kept entirely separate by law from the money that pays for teachers, books, programs, etc.
Building projects are paid out of the Physical Plant and Equipment Levy (PPEL) fund, Murphy explained.
"We're not rich in that fund but we know that we have adequate resources in that fund for at least the next 10 years that we'll be fine. That money cannot be transferred to the general fund by law. It is stupid, but it's the law," he said.
If the ISL is approved, what will happen?
"If it passes, we will still have a hard year for this fall and next spring for the 2009-10 fiscal year. I don't think there will be any major changes in programming. The board is committed to a balanced budget," said Murphy.
By 2010-11, the board hopes to revisit some of the programs that were cut.
Will the programs that were cut get reinstated?
"If the ISL passes (in September), my hope would be during the 2010-11 academic year, if we have stability in student count, we could reincorporate a few of the programs we've lost," said Murphy. "I want to make the senior high school kids a priority, make sure we try to keep the T & I program."
Both Murphy and Stelzer agree that the programs will probably not be reinstated in the same form that they were before the cuts.
Isn't the ISL like giving a blank check to the school board?
"For one thing, I don't believe there's any blank check in the school finance at all. We are tremendously regulated by how much we can do," Stelzer said. "The blank check is only blank in so far that we have a small range that we can use. It's a very limited and all absolutely completely in the open. You're going to know exactly what we're doing.
"And we don't have free range to say whatever we want to. It's limited to a certain amount, a certain time frame as far as years that we can do it and the 10 percent of the operating budget is a number that they can come up with and they will know exactly what we want," he continued.
"We're hoping to go well below that, but in quite a number of these districts from the numbers that they have, are at the maximum they can levy," Stelzer said.
"There is, in effect, what someone could consider a blank check for up to 10 percent of the present, existing general fund, that is true," said Murphy.
"Now, because of the flexibility that we've afforded ourselves in the resolution, as I said you can levy nothing or you can levy up to 10 percent. There no question about it. Remember, that money doesn't go into the Physical Plant and Equipment Levy (PPEL) fund or the infrastructure fund, it goes to the general fund only. So it has to be used for academic services," Murphy said.
If the ISL fails, what will happen?
"If the ISL fails and we have a loss of students, this board will have many meetings between October and March," said Murphy. "We will look at the middle school teachers and the whole teaming concept there. In the elementary, we will look at expanding class sizes and discharging teachers. We will need to look at the attendance centers."
"We will have to look at everything such as larger class sizes, and personnel cuts in the middle school and high school," Stelzer said.
How much will the ISL cost me?
"The ISL is asking something from everyone as opposed to a large amount," Stelzer said. The two used as an example the 5-percent ISL levy the board planned to use for the 2008-09 school year.
On the average house valued at $100,000 in the Le Mars Community School District, the tax levy would be $20-$22 per year, Stelzer explained.
"That's a doable amount for most people, including retired folks with no income. Those same folks with no income won't owe for the Iowa income tax surtax because they don't pay income tax," Stelzer said.
"For those of us still working, look at your Iowa income tax return to see what you paid to the state in the last year. If it was $1,000, then you pay $20 in surtax," Stelzer said. That represents a 2 percent income surtax.
For ag land owners, the tax increase is 37 cents per acre, based on the $822 per acre average (production value, not market value), as determined by the Plymouth County Assessor.
Commercial property increase would be $50 per $100,000 value under the board's plan.
Why did the school district buy the former Wells' Corporate Headquarters now?
"We had been negotiating with Wells' Dairy and talking with those people three years prior to when they started the plans for that building to see if we could get an administrative building," Murphy said. "That money comes out of the PPEL fund."
That fund, kept entirely separate from the fund that pays for teacher salaries and programs by law, has sufficient money for projects into the future, he said.
Can booster clubs and fundraisers help pay for these programs?
"We can't count on them for the general fund," said Murphy. "(Their contribution) is an add-on."
"They talk about it as we do the main course for student education and they (booster clubs) add some gravy," Stelzer said.
"The Music Boosters pay for choir robes and band uniforms. It's not required by state mandate to have and it isn't part of the curriculum, but it sure is nice for them to have," Stelzer said. "That by total budget amount is not that much. And could the booster clubs do that much, like pay for salaries. No, it's just too big a dollar amount to ask of them."
"They certainly have the right to make a contribution to the school general fund, whatever they can, and that's what they basically do," said Murphy.
Why not sell school property like Camp Quest?
"The school does own 20 acres of land on 12th Street Southeast, which is leased to the city of Le Mars for a borrow pit," Murphy said. "In exchange, our vocational ag students lease land on Highway 3 West. We also have Camp Quest immediate east of town.
"We've been asked why don't you sell those immediately, get funds, take care of this stuff and pay teachers," Murphy said. "You folks know the answer already -- the money doesn't go back into the general fund."
"I've suggested we consider the sale of some of these properties, and make the district leaner, but today is not the day to do it. The market is not advantageous," Murphy said. "All those issues are being looked at."
What about the Phase II construction project?
"We haven't addressed that as a board," said Stelzer. "At this moment in time, even though it's still a very good idea and a lot of people in the community really, really want us to go ahead, I think we need to do one significant issue or battle at a time. We need to reaffirm the support of our community for education. I believe we've always had it," Stelzer said.
"I don't see that competition gym being built for some time," said Murphy.
"The project includes not only a competition gym but classrooms, wrestling and music rooms and new locker rooms. It would be a big asset to the community," said Stelzer.
How many schools in the area use the ISL?
The Le Mars Community School District is the only district in Plymouth County and Sioux County that does not have the ISL. Le Mars Community is also the only district in the Lakes Conference that does not have the ISL in place.
In the top 15 3A schools in the state of Iowa, Le Mars Community is one of three that does not have ISL funding as part of its general fund budget.
The Le Mars Community Schools board of education made two rounds of cuts to balance the 2008-09 fiscal year budget.
On Jan. 14, 2008, cuts totaling $480,000, were:
* Reduce two (2.0) Elementary Teachers @ $60,000 per teacher - $120,000
* Reduce one (1.0) Middle School Teacher @ $60,000 per teacher $60,000
* Reduce Central Office Administrator (assistant superintendent of operations) - $110,000
* Reduce Aide Time by 100 hours per week - $50,000
* Discontinue one day Professional Development - $45,000
* No New Textbook Purchase (for one year only) - $65,000
* Eliminate the Activity Busses - $15,000
* Reduce Building Budgets - $15,000
Total - $480,000
On April 7, following the defeat of the ISL by district voters, the board made the following cuts, totaling $254,000:
Reduce Elementary Guidance - $56,000
Eliminate T & I (welding only) - $50,000
Eliminate TK - $60,000
Eliminate 1/2 time music position - $30,000
Eliminate High School Tutorial Program - $22,000
Eliminate School Liaison - $20,000
Eliminate High School TAPS - $16,000
Total - $254,000
Total cuts for the 2008-09 school year: $734,000
(The information published in Monday's edition incorrectly identified the cuts as being for the 2009-10 school year.)



I think there is a limited view of what we as a community can do. First of all, lets be specific, general funds are not specific; ask directly for what you want and you will have a better chance getting it. As far as budgeting, why aren't we doing a 20 year averaging student count that is revised annually and looks backward to compare forward? This would negate surges in population growth/decline and the funds would even out over time.
Also, why are we still using the 8:45-3:45 m-f system? There are many savings to longer school days with 4 day attendance? or how about year round classes with quarterly breaks? there are other ways to enhance the education and be more efficient. I am all in favor of promoting and supporting our students as it is our future investment. I'm not in favor of senseless cuts to punish the voters for not approving. Next time, be specific in the request, it might be an easier way.
Watch the fund separations and how they are utilized, putting money where it isn't directly impacting the students can lead to incorrect assumptions. We don't need the Old Wells corporate office, then again it might make a nice overflow classroom space...
To all,
A positive attitude moves things forward.
Vote "YES"
This is a quote from the Le Mars Daily Sentinel. "I'm going to bring it back every time as quickly as we can until we know it's not going to work or it's going to work. It takes so long to get the thing to work," Murphy added. So, are we to be bullied into voting yes until this passes?
My husband and I both attended the meeting. We listened and asked questions. We put a VOTE YES sign in our yard afterwards.
We make sure our children have shoes,coats,lunch money,ect. when they need it. Our children are doing well in school and we are all for smaller class sizes. By voting no we are taking away opportunity for our children. We are saying we are not willing to help pay for education. I might not agree with the way the money is being spent but it is not the kids fault. I will be glad when the vote is over. VOTE YES!! for the children!
Everyone who is writting on the blog can you tell me 1 thing who on here actullay went to the meetings that the school board had? If you dont't go you have nothing to talk about on this blog!!
CoolMom,
Very clearly stated. We are just on different sides of this issue.
I am aware of the need for a vote on this issue.
I mis-spoke on the "feed" portion of the athletics, it's just an area where there is so much money spent that many other programs suffer. I believe there are limits to everything and this is an area that hasn't been touched.
I am a parent and will vote no. I think someone has to be held fiscally responsible. I have to be when I am paying my bills. Every day people have to deal with the wants and needs, I think the school district needs to do the same thing. I think that there is a time and place to ask for help. I'm not sure that the taxpayers are where the money truly needs to come from.
CoolMom,
When the Board decided to participate in the ISL we could only ask for 5 years.The participation document stated, in plain English, that if the ISL was petitioned an election would be held on Sept. 9, 2008, for a ten year term.
We "yes voters" would probably rather not vote at all. In fact we didn't ask for the election. It was the petition that forced the election.
By the way, the district does not feed athletes. Sometimes the Booster Club does though.
Have a nice weekend.
If the ISL doesn't pass this time and more jobs are cut and classes have to combine, what's to stop people from sending their kids to smaller schools in this area? I know of many people who have talked about it or already switched for those reasons. I graduated from a smaller school. Smaller class sizes are so important for kids, especially in elementary school, to ensure each child gets the attention and education they need.
You think the enrollment is down now?? Just wait until more people leave if the ISL doesn't pass.
For all of you who comment on holding a fundraiser similar to the Gehlan Ball..great Step Up Take the Lead and Organize the Event if you think that is a realistic solution year after year after year........
It's the "$22" per years for 10 years that I can't seem to get over. 10 years...that's quite a long time and I can see that the increase isn't going to affect everyone equally or at the same level as it is others.
Many are having a hard enough time making ends meet, adding this to those households could be truly horrible. Jobs are being cut right and left in LeMars, and many more yet to come (Well's isn't done - I'm sure). It's a scary time, it's time to buckle down.
Everyone needs to buckle down. Cut "Freshman" sports, have JV and Varsity only. Possibly go to a tryout for teams, instead of everyone gets to be on the team and only this many truly play - but we bus, feed and put uniforms on so many more.
Budget....the school needs to budget. If they have "special projects" they should fundraise and ask all of those "yes voters" to kick in their dollars.
Just a thought....
Forest,
Your claim that all day kindergarten is best for a 5 or 6 year old is self-serving and highly debateable.
As to the state mandates I would like to see proof and what the "fines" would be...where can I find this information?
If it is true..it needs to be changed and maybe you "educated" me without costing us a dime.
Vote No to help the children...they will be inheriting enough of a tax burden.
Clearthinker,
Something to think about. You say cut All Day Kindergarten. Interesting, cut early education where it has the best effect on the student's learning abilities. I believe it is 2009 or 2010 all day kindergarten will be mandated by the state. We are ahead of the game on it. We either do that or pay the fines to the state for not having it. Not a savings option.
Also, it is mandated by the state to offer transportation to those students outside the city limit.
Why not make a stand right here and right now?!
I have my choice just as you have yours. MAKE DO WITH WHAT YOU HAVE!
A 10 year tax levy is too long!
This is not just $22.00 or whatever this "extra tax" will be. Depending on specific markers.
I get it.
The teachers and staff are worried about their jobs.
I get it.
Harkers is closing. That means one less business and possibly 28 or more "former" employees who can't pick up that tax slack regarding this vote.
I am frankly sick and tired of being hammered and browbeaten about saving the school. Have larger classrooms, cut back on things that are not must haves and balance your budget. What don't you get?! Jobs are leaving this area whether we have the school or not. People and children are leaving. Why burden us with more taxes?!
This levy affects homes, farms, businesses and on and on.
You say for the children. OK. I say with another tax there is one or more less things for me to offer my children because I will be directly affected by yet another tax. Why are you making this so difficult? Have a ball, or a fundraiser or a carwash. Enough money has been wasted in this community by various wants. Enough is enough!
Where can I get one of the signs that are "Black & White" and say "NO" to the new taxes?????
To working_class_dog:
I appreciate the civil discourse. Let's hope others will continue the respectful tone.
As I have mentioned in a previous post, I am about as fiscally conservative as they come. I expect my tax dollars to be spent wisely. If it were up to me, my tax dollars would be spent strictly on national defense, basic infrastructure, and education.
I certainly do not downplay concerns about higher taxes. Unfortunately, many tax-funded entities get lumped together in these arguments and our schools get demonized in the process. Let's face it, before the previous ISL vote, the county raised taxes…and didn't need to come before the voters. The city raised taxes…and didn't need to come before the voters. Along came the first ISL vote…can we say target? From my point of view, that was misdirected anger. Unfortunately, it was the only available target at the time.
The school was hit with a huge enrollment drop. They cut $734,000 which affected many of our students. Instead of putting the entire load on property owners, the Board proposed the ISL so that non-property owners would also share the burden with the income surtax.
The LCS tax levy is the 2nd LOWEST out of the 15 3A schools similar in size to Le Mars. The ISL proposal would only move us to the 3rd LOWEST position on that list. This is not an "everyone else is doing it" argument. This illustrates the efforts of our school district to levy as little as possible while remaining fiscally sound.
It is disheartening to watch some in our community decide that the place to "make a stand" is on the students of our community. I believe that is the wrong place to do so, especially when it is not warranted.
If I went out and bought a car (All day kindergarten) then had a drop in income that made the car unaffordable it would be wise for me to get rid of the car. (whether or not the market is "right" or not Mr. Murphy)
If I went out and bought a car (all day kindergarten) that I knew I couldn't afford but expected to force (isl) my neighbors to pay for it..that is borderline criminal.
Cut the all day Kindergarten.
If we have fewer students shouldn't our cost go down??
I agree with your point '73 Grad but since you bring up Farmers..
Why do we continue to fund Rural Bus Routes when one or both parents works in town anyway?
Why does the kid who lives 2 miles accross town at the city limit have to walk to school when his neighbor on the other side of the road gets to ride to school on the bus?
Cut the rural bus routes.
I am so tired of reading that "this is for the children".."oh my gosh this is for the children".."if you love your children you will vote yes"...BullPucky!
You teach them reading, writing and arithmetic while I teach my kids good budgeting, fiscal responsiblilty and resisting scare tactics for new taxes.
If you notice where 90% of the "vote yes" signs are, teachers, retired teachers, administrators and board members..all people who will directly benefit from a "yes" vote...I wish I could vote myself a raise.
To the pitiful argument that "Le Mars is the only District in NW Iowa without an ISL"...that is one reason I live in Le Mars.
I will resist Dr. and Lawyer jokes..
No New Taxes!
'73 Grad
Tax on ground is $.37 an acre(1000 acres $370.00). Tax on his home is the same as a city dweller $125,000 home is $27.50. Iowa sales tax surtax is the same for all of us. We are told by the assessor's office that hog confinements are taxed at the $.37 an acre rate that it sits on. So the way I understand it, if you have a confinement on 160 acres the tax on land and building comes to $59.20. I find that hard to believe but that is what we are told. I hope this covers it.
All of the figures are per year.
To LetsThinkAboutThat-
You have defended your view admirably, but at what point are little increases to your tax bills enough?
I've resided in Le Mars for less than ten years and I've seen my annual property tax bill increase 56%. I realize that is not all going to the school, but at some point you have to take a stand and say enough is enough.
Our household income has not increased that dramatically and it has increased our monthly house payment by 10% during that time frame since the taxes and insurance are escrowed.
I'm sorry but I'm not buying the only pennies a day and everyone else is doing it argument.
Please vote NO to yet another tax increase.
Reading these comments were informative to me as the ISl topic just bores me to death to read. I am now looking to vote yes, because my kids will be going to LCS in a year or two and I dont want them sitting in over crowded classes learning old materials. I went to community and it was a nice school, better then most I visited in the area, lets keep it that way!
To add to my last comment: People who don't have children in the school systems yet- the result of this vote is going to affect your children for years to come: You choose whether they are positively or negatively affected.
I'm fairly new to the school system in LeMars, but this sounds like a no-brainer to me. It amazes me how people want to crank about the school system not giving their kids everything they need and taking away programs and yet people will vote against something as important as the ISL. For the small amount of money it's going to cost people, I would think they could make some small sacrifice to secure their children's futures... We can see where people's priorities lie by the way they vote, and if you vote no, education and our children are obviously not a priority. Vote YES
Mr. Smith, can you tell me what this does to the average farmer?
SteveInLemars,
Two years ago we lost 30 kids ($165,000.00). Last year we lost 80 kids ($440,000.00). That's roughly $605,000.00 State of Iowa revenue lost (not spent) in just the last two years. We still have $1,000,000.00 in the bank to cover when we have to pay bills but revenue checks haven't come yet. Sorry, "squandered" is dramatic but doesn't fit here. How much of your money do you want the District to have in the bank? Come to the meeting tonight or tomorrow night and ask questions.
Has anyone else reached the point of exasperation? Many insinuations on these comment boards have been cast around with little connection to truth. I can appreciate differing opinions on this topic, but let's keep it civil and based on facts. Much of this information can be found in previous Sentinel articles or from the public meetings. Here are some basics for those with an open mind.
Fact: In 1994 the LCS tax levy was $12.50. Since that year, the tax levy has been UNDER that amount until last year when the need pushed it back to $12.50. The Board publicly committed to keeping the levy as low as possible, so when the need was less, they LOWERED it!
Fact: The Board proposed plan with the ISL would cost the average homeowner in Le Mars (with a $100,000 home) $22 extra a year in property taxes. That is $1.83 a month.
Fact: The same plan would add $25 a year to the average tax return (and that includes joint filers). That is $2.08 a month.
Fact: The purchase of the Well's building was not done with General Fund money. The upkeep of the building is taken care of with the rent paid to the school by the other tenants and the money saved by housing the Individual Learning Center.
Fact: The LCS ranks 337th (out of 365 districts-from latest figures in 2006) in per-pupil spending in Iowa.
Fact: The ISL is used by 339 school districts in Iowa. (This year there are 362 districts in Iowa)
I don't enjoy paying new taxes. Who does? But the Le Mars Community School district is in a bind. It is not from elaborate waste like a few keep trying to insinuate. The drastic drop in enrollment could not be projected. The Board then cut $734,000, affecting many students in our district, from larger class sizes in 4th and 5th grade to popular programs at the high school.
We all have a decision to make. One choice is to tell the Board to cut more from the budget, affecting more students.
Or, we can offer an average of $3.91 a month to send a message to our children and the community that we support the schools in their efforts to educate the youth in the Le Mars Community School District.
A community's school district usually illustrates the priorities and values of that community. We will find out how our community measures up on September 9th. I will be voting YES.
To SteveInLemars
Le Mars Community Schools is the only school district in Plymouth and Sioux Counties and one of very few in the Iowa which does not already have an ISL. Tell me -- how would you equate that into your conclusion that the school board and administration are "squandering" money in the operating fund? If we were to accept your logic every school board and administration in Plymouth and Sioux counties as well as over 95% of the school boards and administrations in Iowa should be replaced. Get real.
If the ISL is voted down again our schools (both Gehlen Catholic and Le Mars Community), our businesses, and our community in general will suffer from the long term negative consequences and image.
In My Opinion a no vote is like slamming the door in the face of any child asking for help so that they can receive a quality and well rounded education. Be positive about our children, our grandchildren, and our community. Vote yes on 9/9/08.
"When we first added all-day, every day kindergarten, we did not have enough money to do that. We used operating fund money" Stelzer said.
"It wasn't unrealistic to see an 80-kid drop. It scared us," Murphy said.
These statements are direct quotes taken from the article above. Taken together they prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the school board squandered the money that they had in the operting fund full well knowing that they could be in financial trouble if they did so.
Now they want us to sign a blank check as is stated in the article "There is, in effect, what someone could consider a blank check for up to 10 percent of the present, existing general fund, that is true," said Murphy.
What we need is to vote in a new school board who will hire a new superintendant who will be much more frugal in their approach to spending the public's money. When they admit to wasting money in an appeal to raise taxes they are proving that they are not the people who should be in charge of our funds.
I concur with many of the things Dream_It and bzemom have to say. Long term implications of not passing this go beyond the school district. This can affect prospects for growth in our communities. The school district's health and support are huge item for families and businesses deciding whether or not to come to LeMars and surrounding areas. To not pass this again gives the outsider looking in a bad message. Vote yes.
As a former student at LCHS I also believe it is important to vote YES, I know that someday I will have my own children and I would like them to attend Le Mars Community, it's a scary thought knowing they maynot be able to or, if they do, stuff will be junk with nothing to offer. I encourage people to help make the education in this town a top priority, kids or not. Someday sooner or later, everyone will be affected by the pass of this vote, be it their own children, or grandchildren, great-grand children, and so on and so fourth!
I really hope the community can go out and support this vote this time around. I spoke with a lot of people on last vote, they thought this would be a sure thing, so they didn't vote. Obviously they were wrong. Please remember EVERY vote counts. I've been seeing several "yes" signs around town, but the "no's" are starting to pop up too. I really believe we need to pass this. I don't necessarily agree with past spending, however, I don't feel we should punish the students. Please support our students and vote "yes"!!