![[Masthead]](http://www.lemarssentinel.com/images/nameplate.png)
RSS
Print
Email link
Respond to editor
Read comments (4)
Share link
Facebook
Twitter
del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Newsvine
Reddit
GoogleA former California couple, Al and Rosalie Ladie, who purchased the lot last December for $25,000, reduced from the original city asking price of $30,000 taking into consideration the city's "as is" description. The couple discovered later there were no available water and sewer lines to the site intended to be their new home.
A "hold harmless release" agreement from the Ladies to return the property to the city in return for their $25,000 purchase price entered the picture Tuesday during the council session with realtor Roger Athens, who handled the sale on behalf of the city, expressing his concern and that of the buyers on learning of the lack of available utilities services.
Questioning how the city had been allowed to sell the property without water and sewer, Athens challenged the statement by council member Delana Ihrke that the information had been made available in council information provided at a December public hearing indicating that "water and sewer lines were to be provided by the buyer" of the property and expressed concern as well that "it has taken from December until May" for the matter to be fully clarified.
The question of the unavailable sewer and water lines then fast forwarded to of the probability of the city installing the lines and the question of the cost of the work.
After considerable discussion at this point, Councilman Ken Nelson moved, with the second by Ihrke, to suggest that City Administrator Scott Langel and city staff proceed to install a sewer line to the property in the "most expedient and economical" location for the line. The Ladies would have the option to retain the property or make way for the city to find a new buyer. Cost of the line, Langel said, would be approximately $1,000 to $1,500 for the city with the Ladies' cost approximately $2,000.
The resolution passed on a 4-1 vote with Councilman John Rexwinkel, who has earlier advocated the property for future park purposes, opposing the measure.
Council members have asked Athens to contact the Ladies and to report back to the council at its next session regarding any change in their ownership of the lot as a result of the city's agreement to install a sewer line along Central Avenue that would allow them possible affordable hook-up with their property.
A public hearing is anticipated on the matter following Athens report to the council.
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please
i have no immediate knowledge of this story, but there's something about the deal that seems fishy.
can anyone help explain the details?
It's typical for lots in the city to have sewer and water service lines. Since this parcel was not used as a residential lot, there these service lines were never needed and not installed. Apparently the new buyers were not informed or aware of the need for these service lines.
why was this lot originally considered surplus? when this was dedicated in 1993 it was with the understanding that it would always be parkland. the O'Toole family would like some answers.
This would not be the first time the Lades have agreed to purchase property in LeMars and then "changed their mind". One time maybe that could happen but a second time and then you have to think it is becoming a pattern. One would think it would of been prudent to check water/sewer lines prior to making the purchase. The city taxpayers shouldn't have to pay up for the Lades not doing their homework.