|
|
|
|
|
Partly Cloudy ~ High: 80°F ~ Low: 52°F Sunday, May 19, 2013 |
|
The "History" in MoviesPosted Wednesday, February 3, 2010, at 9:03 AM
Cramming for that last minute test? Yep, done that. Trying to find a more exciting way to study then look in a book? Sure thought about it. Decided to watch a movie about said events for clarification (and a little more excitement)? Who hasn't?
When I was young and naive I thought for sure that if you watched a movie and it said "based on true events" it was, well... true. Even if the movie didn't say true events, I was still waiting to find Gremlins in the upstairs closet and was truly hoping that if I left enough Reese's Pieces out, E.T. would come to my house. However as I grew and had to at least push these childish thoughts to the back of my mind, I realized that movies are not necessarily factual, and when they use the word "base" it really means, "one thought sounded good, now let's make a two hour story out of it." I'm not sure when this revelation first came upon me, but I know "Titanic" was a big eye opener. I had been truly captivated by the story of "Titanic" since I was in elementary and had studied it as much as I could. I saw the movie the day after it came out in theaters and was captivated by Rose and Jack and the awesome power of watching the boat from true majesty to heap at the bottom of the ocean. Then I began to read the articles, and reality started to sink in - most of the inaccuracies were little. Like it was to cold for ice to have formed in the people's hair in the water and the song that they sung at church hadn't even been written yet. Some bigger ones are the way Jack was allowed to jump between decks and the way Titanic was named. And so I began my look for "truth" in the movies. A while back I looked up a childhood favorite movie of mine, "Wild Hearts Can't Be Broken". It is a wonderful story of a girl in the depression who leaves her aunt's house to dive horses, find love and eventually learns to dive blind. That short little sentence is about all that's true of that story too. Everything else that came in the movie was either an exaggeration or just completely false. Why would Hollywood mislead us in this way? Why can't we have the straight up truth? Well, in the famous words of Colonel Nathan Jessep (A Few Good Men), "YOU CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH!" People go to the movies to be entertained, and watching a girl jump on horse day after day, without falling or having personal challenges and just falling in love because you're with the same guy every day would not entertain the audience. Maybe we should try to entice Hollywood to be a little more truthful, especially in cases when movies are touted to be historically correct. "Titanic", "Public Enemies" and "Valkyrie" are a few of the movies that may come close, but don't quite make the cut. "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" was noted as being the most historically accurate portrayal of Jesse James and Robert Ford, though I'm sure a historian could still find some inaccuracies. You also run into movies like "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" that are using the false document technique. This is a technique which works on blurring the lines of truth and fiction. "Texas Chainsaw" used this technique because they thought people would be more inclined to watch something so truly horrifying if it was thought to be true. And you know what? They were right. In the end, don't cram for that last minute test by watching a popular movie or quoting it in an essay, you might look a fool to your history professor. I also challenge you that when you do watch a historical based movie, to read about it before or after to find the inaccuracies listed, so you yourself will not be misled. Even the simplest of misconceptions can change the history of the world. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
I started blogging about my fun experiencing parenthood and have found it has evolved into more than just parenting - its an observation of life as we know it. I'm a bystander in this country just as we all are, and sometimes, opinions just need to be said without fear of being burnt at the stake.
Hot topics Teenage Lessons: Actions have Consequences(0 ~ 10:54 AM, Apr 5)
Are we too overprotective of our children?
We are an imperfect society
Careful what you wish for
Arts vs. Sports in Schools
|
When I was in college, we once had an assignment where we read the Grimms Fairy Tale "Snow White" and we also watched the Disney movie and then took a test on both. I did both, and did OK, but the students that only did one or the other (mostly the movie) were in trouble. It was amazing how many differences occured in the two formats.
One ought never get one's politics, history or religion from Hollywood movies. Hollywood is in the business of making money via movies. And they do it well.
They are NOT in the business of politics, history or religion. There are other venues more suited for those fields of study.
What venues would those be?
History: Books and teachers.
Religion: Books and Preachers.
Politics: Books, magazines, TV News, internet/blogs, radio, your fellow man.
p.s., A better word would have been "means" vice "venue"....maybe.
That's an interesting statement, since before you've said explicitly that there is "no such thing as a reliable source".
I think I respectfully disagree. Just because something is in a particular format doesn't mean it has credibility. There are movies where one can get credible information: documentaries.
Credibility for a source of information comes from the use of citations. By using citations one can verify the stated facts and engage in a reasonable discussion. Without them, there's no way of ensuring the material presented is factual.
I find it interesting that you say magazines, TV News, internet/blogs, radio, your fellow man are appropriate sources for politics, but not for history or religion. Why isn't the internet appropriate for historical research, but OK for politics?
TJ - You bring up a good point about documentaries, however one needs to keep an open mind even about documentaries. Such as Farenheight 9/11 vs. Farenhype 9/11. Political agendas underline in both of those, but they are considered documentaries. Though I'm sure Michael Moore is probably not the best to bring up. And in the end even the history books are written as it was experienced by the people writing. I'm told in Germany their accounts of World War II are a lot different then the history we teach over here. Though I'd still trust my old history teacher over a movie!
BKinney, you are absolutely right. A documentary is only as strong as its sources.
Many movies depict accurately with a balance of entertainment. Take for example "Rabbit Proof Fence' where attempts to kep the historical accuracy intact while having to 'fill in' some of the details to keep the flow. Impact of movies are to capture the crowds. I tend to not only watch the movie but the making and background as well to see what the director had to work with. I like to see movies that have the input from those involved in the actual historical event.
Check out 'Up in the Air' which should still be in the theaters. SOme of the acting crew were actually folks who were laid off from their jobs! Just adds a little bit more to the story to have actual 'life' in it, even tho it isn't based on a true story.
It can work either way. Interesting.
"no such thing as a reliable source"
I said that and I stand by that statement.
Anything created by man has a bias to it.
Books.
Magazines.
TV "news" programs.
Speeches.
Blogs.
They all have a bias, BUT, those listed are much better than a made for profit movie that comes out of Hollywood. Are some more accurate than others? Yes. Do they still have a bias? Yes. There are NO reliable sources.....up to and especially including, ME.
But I would be interested in a few examples of accurate historical movies out of Hollywood.
I can only think of one: Band of Brothers. Even that one took literary license on some engagements, or so I was told by a WWII combat paratrooper.
A777Pilot, Rabbit proof fence is accurate historically. I would have to think of some others... I know I've seen some pretty accurate documentaries.